Empirical Analysis on the Sustainable Development of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment from the Perspective of Economic Institution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The countries along the Belt and Road (B&R) are important destinations of China's outward foreign direct investment (OFDI). Based on the panel data (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)) on China's OFDI in 65 B&R countries, this paper sets up a Heckman two-stage model, and then empirically analyzes how China's OFDI is affected by the difference between China and the host country in economic institution. In addition, the authors explored whether China has institutional preference in the OFDI with different investment motives. The empirical test shows that: investment selection and investment scale of China's OFDI are promoted to different degrees by the economic institution of the host country, and the absolute distance between China and the host country in economic institution; China has different institutional preferences in market-seeking OFDI between the selection stage and the investment stage; In terms of technology-seeking OFDI, host countries with short economic institutional distance are preferred in the selection stage, and host countries with good economic institution and long economic institutional distance are preferred in the investment stage. The research results provide empirical evidence for China to continuously implement OFDI in B&R countries and create a green investment environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it