MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022515678 · doi:10.7202/1068350ar

Une histoire de la Marche mondiale des femmes porteuse pour l’avenir. Les expériences et les contributions des centres de femmes du Québec1

2020· article· fr· W3022515678 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Véronique Billette

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Marche mondiale des femmes a permis de vivre des expériences et de faire des apprentissages hors de l’ordinaire. En revisitant l’histoire de cette grande mobilisation, à travers la perspective locale de femmes du Québec, l’auteure a pour objectif de documenter les expériences et les contributions de groupes locaux à cette mobilisation transnationale, mais aussi de rendre compte des acquis liés à la mise en oeuvre des actions. Tout porte à croire que ces acquis ont perduré dans le temps, et l’on peut supposer que cette expérience porteuse est peut-être l’une des assises des mobilisations féministes renouvelées (locales ou transnationales).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0280.016
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207