Deep Correlation Mining Based on Hierarchical Hybrid Networks for Heterogeneous Big Data Recommendations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advancement of several significant technologies, such as artificial intelligence, cyber intelligence, and machine learning, has made big data penetrate not only into the industry and academic field but also our daily life along with a variety of cyber-enabled applications. In this article, we focus on a deep correlation mining method in heterogeneous big data environments. A hierarchical hybrid network (HHN) model is constructed to describe multitype relationships among different entities, and a series of measures are defined to quantify the internal correlations within one specific layer or external correlations between different layers. An intelligent router based on deep reinforcement learning framework is designed to generate optimal actions to route across the HHN. An improved random walk with the restart-based algorithm is then developed with the intelligent router, based on the hierarchical influence across network associated with multiple correlations. An intelligent recommendation mechanism is finally designed and applied to support users' collaboration works in scholarly big data environments. Experiments based on DBLP and ResearchGate data show the practicability and usefulness of our model and method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it