Parental accommodation of symptoms in adolescents with chronic pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic pain in adolescents can be highly impairing. Parental reactions to their child's pain are important factors influencing pain perception and pain-related impairment in children and adolescents. The present study aimed to examine parental accommodation of pain symptoms using the Inventory of Parent Accommodations of Children's Symptoms (IPACS) to provide empirical support for the utility of this measure in parents of adolescents with chronic pain. We examined the prevalence, nature, and correlates of accommodation behaviors in 66 adolescents with chronic pain and their parents using the IPACS. All parents reported some level of accommodation of their child's pain symptoms. After controlling for pain severity, parental accommodation was associated with functional impairment. In addition, parental accommodation mediated the link between parental catastrophizing reactions to pain and child impairment and between child anxiety and depressive symptoms and child impairment. The IPACS appears to be a useful measure of parental accommodation of pain. Parental accommodation should be included as an intervention target when necessary. It is important to educate families about the negative consequences that can be related to excessive accommodation of pain symptoms and to provide effective resources to manage the impact of chronic pain and replace accommodation with more adaptive pain coping strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".