MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Xe</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>136</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>with EXO-200

2012· article· lv· W3022555900 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityLaurentian University
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDouble beta decayPhysicsMAJORANANeutrinoParticle physicsBETA (programming language)Nuclear physicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on a search for neutrinoless double-beta decay of $^{136}\mathrm{Xe}$ with EXO-200. No signal is observed for an exposure of 32.5 kg yr, with a background of $\ensuremath{\sim}1.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{kg}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{yr}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{keV}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ in the $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1\ensuremath{\sigma}$ region of interest. This sets a lower limit on the half-life of the neutrinoless double-beta decay ${T}_{1/2}^{0\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}}(^{136}\mathrm{Xe})&gt;1.6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{25}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{yr}$ (90% C.L.), corresponding to effective Majorana masses of less than 140--380 meV, depending on the matrix element calculation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it