MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Xe</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>136</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>with EXO-200

2012· article· lv· W3022555900 on OpenAlexaff
M. Auger, D. J. Auty, P. S. Barbeau, E. Beauchamp, V. Belov, C. Benitez-Medina, M. Breidenbach, T. Brunner, A. Burenkov, B. T. Cleveland, S. Cook, T. Daniels, M. Danilov, C. G. Davis, S. Delaquis, R. DeVoe, A. Dobi, M. J. Dolinski, A. Dolgolenko, M. Dunford, W. M. Fairbank, J. Farine, W. Feldmeier, P. Fierlinger, D. Franco, G. Giroux, R. Gornea, K. Graham, G. Gratta, C. Hall, K. Hall, C. K. Hargrove, S. Herrin, M. Hughes, A. S. Johnson, T. N. Johnson, A. Karelin, L. J. Kaufman, A. Kuchenkov, K.S. Kumar, D. S. Leonard, François Léonard, D. Mackay, R. MacLellan, M. G. Marino, B. Mong, M. Montero Díez, Axel Müller, R. Neilson, R. Nelson, A. Odian, I. Ostrovskiy, K. O’Sullivan, C. Ouellet, A. Piepke, A. Pocar, C.Y. Prescott, K. Pushkin, P.C. Rowson, J. J. Russell, A. Sabourov, D. Sinclair, S. Slutsky, V. Stekhanov, T. Tolba, D. Tosi, K. Twelker, P. Vogel, J.-L. Vuilleumier, A. P. Waite, T. Walton, M. Weber, U. Wichoski, J. Wodin, John D. Wright, L. Yang, Y.-R. Yen, O. Zeldovich

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityLaurentian University
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDouble beta decayPhysicsMAJORANANeutrinoParticle physicsBETA (programming language)Nuclear physicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on a search for neutrinoless double-beta decay of $^{136}\mathrm{Xe}$ with EXO-200. No signal is observed for an exposure of 32.5 kg yr, with a background of $\ensuremath{\sim}1.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{kg}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{yr}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{keV}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ in the $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1\ensuremath{\sigma}$ region of interest. This sets a lower limit on the half-life of the neutrinoless double-beta decay ${T}_{1/2}^{0\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}}(^{136}\mathrm{Xe})>1.6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{25}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{yr}$ (90% C.L.), corresponding to effective Majorana masses of less than 140--380 meV, depending on the matrix element calculation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations419
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207