MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022612976 · doi:10.2514/1.g003856

Hybrid Finite-Frequency Attitude Control Motivated by Volterra Series

2020· article· en· W3022612976 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoyu Lang, Christopher J. Damaren, Xibin Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Volterra seriesFrequency domainMathematicsEuler's formulaEuler equationsController (irrigation)Nonlinear systemSeries (stratigraphy)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical solution of Euler’s equation is exhibited using the Volterra series theory in the frequency domain. Based on the Volterra series, the nonlinear output frequency response functions of Euler’s equation are formulated by a numerical algorithm to reveal an energy-transfer phenomenon. The output responses of Euler’s equation have some higher frequency parts than those of the inputs. It provides motivation to design a finite-frequency controller for Euler’s equation to accommodate the high-frequency parts of the outputs. A hybrid passive/finite gain control scheme fused with the generalized Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov lemma is used to generate a controller that is effective for stabilizing the angular velocities of Euler’s equation. Additionally, quaternions are considered in the proposed hybrid finite-frequency controller to stabilize the attitude of spacecraft. Simulation results are demonstrated to validate the effectiveness of the proposed control schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Guidance Control and DynamicsSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207