Supervisi Akademik Meningkatkan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The condition of the teacher at SDN Kepanjen 2 shows far from ideal conditions. The results of preliminary surveys conducted by researchers in the execution of teachers ' duties, seven aspects of pedagogic competence teachers have not seen showing the skills of teachers in carrying out learning. Academic supervision is a selected action researcher to help teachers develop pedagogic skills of the teacher. This research is done cycle by cycle according to the concept of research action, planned there are 2 cycles with each cycle implemented measures planning, implementation, observation, reflection. Data collection techniques used in research using observations, interviews and documentation studies. The results of data analysis obtained exposure that proves that of the seven competencies that are targeted to research obtained an average value increase of 86%. So it can be concluded that the application of academic supervision can improve the pedagogic competence of teachers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it