MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022661672 · doi:10.24076/citec.2019v6i1.244

Rencana Strategis Sistem Informasi Untuk Meningkatkan Keunggulan Dengan Ward And Peppard

2020· article· id· W3022661672 on OpenAlexaff
Ismail Arifin, Bambang Soedijono, Asro Nasiri

Bibliographic record

VenueCreative Information Technology Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDecision Support System Applications
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sebagai salah satu klinik penyedia layanan kesehatan, klinik Cahaya kesehatan yang berada di jalan tanggamus, Pinang Raya, Bengkulu Utara melayani rawat inap, berobat jalan, kondisi darurat, apotek serta laboratorium. Dalam hal ini tentunya ada klinik lain yang merupakan pesaing, diantaranya klinik Kencana dan klinik Citra Medika. Untuk bersaing dengan klinik tersebut, klinik Cahaya Kencana terus berusaha meningkatkan keunggulannya agar bisa unggul dari klinik pesaing. Keunggulan kompetitif tidak hanya ada di sektor sumber daya manusia, namun juga dari segi pemanfaatan TI/SI. Agar mendapat keunggulan kompetitif maka klinik Cahaya Kesehatan membutuhkan perencanaan strategis Sistem Informasi yang selaras dengan visi dan misi klinik. Upaya yang dilakukan untuk mencapai keunggulan kompetitif yaitu menggunakan metode Ward and Peppard dan analisis yang digunakan diantaranya analisis SWOT, PEST, Value Chain serta Mcfarlan Strategic Grid. Adapun hasil yang akan diperoleh dari penelitian ini yaitu rekomendasi rencana strategis Sistem Informasi pada klinik Cahaya Kesehatan yang sesuai dengan visi misi dan tujuan klinik. Kata Kunci — Rencana Strategis, Ward and Peppard, Klinik As one of the health service clinics, the Health Light Clinic located on Tanggamus Street, Pinang Raya, North Bengkulu serves inpatient, outpatient, emergency conditions, pharmacies and laboratories. At this clinic, there is another designated clinic, which can be seen at the clinic is the Kencana and Citra Medika clinics. To compete with these clinics, the Cahaya Kencana clinic continues to improve its excellence in order to excel from competitive clinics. Competitive advantages not only in the human resources sector, but also in terms of IT / SI utilization. In order to gain a competitive advantage, the Light Clinic requires an Information System strategic planning that is in line with the clinic's vision and mission. Efforts are made to achieve competitive advantage by using the Ward and Peppard methods to provide analysis that is used by SWOT, PEST, Value Chain and Mcfarlan Strategic Grid analysis. The results to be obtained from this study are the results of the strategic plan of the Information Systems at the Cahaya Kesehatan clinic in accordance with the vision and mission of the clinic. Keywords — Strategic Plan, Ward and Peppard, Clinic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCreative Information Technology JournalSame topicDecision Support System ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207