MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022700282

A Simple Model for the Skewness of Global Sea-Surface Winds

2004· article· en· W3022700282 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAGUSM · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkewnessForcing (mathematics)Geostrophic windBoundary layerZonal and meridionalMeteorologyPlanetary boundary layerBuoyTurbulenceClimatologyAtmospheric sciencesMathematicsPhysicsGeologyMechanicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A strong linear relationship between the mean and skewness of global sea surface winds (both zonal and meridional) is shown to exist, such that where the wind component is on average positive, it is negatively skewed (and vice versa). This relationship is observed in reanalysis, satellite, and buoy data. This relationship between the mean and skewness fields of sea surface winds follows from the nonlinear surface drag predicted for a turbulent boundary layer by Monin–Obukhov similarity theory since forcing perturbations speeding the wind up are subject to a stronger drag force than perturbations slowing it down. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the results of an empirical fit of observed surface winds to a stochastic differential equation presented in a recent study by Sura are consistent with the white-noise limit of the momentum equations for a turbulent boundary layer subject to fluctuating forcing, albeit with a somewhat different physical interpretation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it