MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022717317 · doi:10.1002/0470011815.b2a04043

Receiver Operating Characteristic (<scp>ROC</scp>) Curves

2005· other· en· W3022717317 on OpenAlexaff
James A. Hanley

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Biostatistics · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicReliability and Agreement in Measurement
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceiver operating characteristicFraction (chemistry)MathematicsBoundary (topology)StatisticsMathematical analysisChromatographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve describes the relationship between the false positive fraction and true negative fraction associated with a diagnostic test as the test threshold defining the boundary between individuals classified as cases or noncases is varied. The ROC curve avoids certain arbitrariness involved in the choice of a single overall index of accuracy. This entry describes how the ROC curve is derived from data, and reviews summary indices that may represent its performance. The comparison of ROC curves for competing tests is discussed, and appropriate software is identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.104
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.104
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0100.013
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of BiostatisticsSame topicReliability and Agreement in MeasurementFrench-language works237,207