Open-label Trial of Lamotrigine Focusing on Efficacy in Vulvodynia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects 15% of women and has a high rate of psychiatric comorbidity. Vulvodynia, a vulvar pain syndrome that includes vulvar vestibulitis, is the most common subtype of CPP. This study examined the efficacy of lamotrigine for the treatment of CPP using an open-label design. STUDY-DESIGN—Forty-three women with CPP were recruited from a specialty pelvic pain clinic. Of these, 31 completed 8 weeks of active treatment. Outcome variables included the McGill Pain Rating Index and subscales of pain intensity and the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Rating Scales. RESULTS—We found significant reductions in all pain and mood measures at the 8-week visit compared to baseline. In particular, women with vulvodynia-type CPP (N=17) had robust reductions in pain and mood symptoms. CONCLUSION—CPP is a heterogeneous disorder, with psychiatric comorbidity and poor treatment response. This open-label study suggests that treatment with lamotrigine in women with the vulvodynia subtype of CPP may be helpful in addressing both the pain and mood symptoms associated with this disorder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".