MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W302278776

Adaptations of Euro-Canadian Schools to Inuit Culture in Selected Communities in Nunavut.

2002· article· en· W302278776 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Paul D. Berger

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousCurriculumPedagogyValue (mathematics)Indigenous cultureSociologyPolitical scienceGeographyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Formal schooling is less than 100 years old in the Kivalliq region of Nunavut. In the last three decades, efforts to reflect and value culture in northern schools have increased, in light of concerns over whether the dominant culture's education system was appropriate or effective for children. These efforts have resulted in varying to the Euro-Canadian school, but it is uncertain whether schools based on a Western model can be adapted effectively to meet the needs of indigenous peoples. Interviews and informal conversations about such adaptations were conducted with 28 educators in five communities in Kivalliq region, Nunavut. Almost all participants were southern Canadians. Participants reported very few instances where community input was solicited, noted as desired, or used in determining a school's direction, and few instances where schools explicitly taught values. Many examples were given of incorporating Inuit into schools, and many practices were documented in which teachers attempted to structure classroom interaction to mirror cultural expectations of students. The most common adaptations reported did not directly move schools toward culture, but reflected the reality of the English-as-a-second-language environment. Recommendations focused on community ownership of schools, indigenous teachers, hiring practices and cross-cultural orientation for non-Inuit teachers, and development of bilingual culturally sensitive curricula and materials. (Contains 64 references.) (Author/SV) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. 1 PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY LAe e-r TO THE EDUCATIMAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Adaptations of Euro-Canadian Schools to Culture in Selected Communities in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207