MeTis meshing-based Bayes 3D ship model geometry reconstruction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to improve the compression efficiency of 3D model geometry reconstruction process, a MeTiS meshing-based Bayes 3D ship model geometry reconstruction algorithm is proposed. The original 3D mesh is subnetted by the MeTiS method at the coding end, and the geometrical shape of the subnet is coded by a random linear matrix, and the neighbour node of the boundary node is considered to construct the data sequence by the pseudo random number generator; then the Bayes algorithm is used to design the geometric model reconstruction algorithm, and the learning rules for the mean, variance matrix and model parameter are theoretically given, realising the geometric reconstruction of 3D model; finally, on the 3D model standard test library and 3D ship model, the simulation comparison with the GFT, LSM and CSGFT and other algorithms show that the proposed method has a relatively high bit rate compression index and a low reconstruction error, leading to significantly improved computational efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it