MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023081776 · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.022

The Importance of Physical Activity to Care for Frail Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020· editorial· en· W3023081776 on OpenAlexafffund
Mylène Aubertin‐Leheudre, Yves Rolland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAging, Health, and Disability
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversité du Québec à MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
KeywordsMedicinePandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Social distanceGerontologyPedometerOutbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)DemographyPhysical activityDiseasePhysical therapyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Virology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0260.038
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Medical Directors AssociationSame topicAging, Health, and DisabilityFrench-language works237,207