MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023085700 · doi:10.1385/1-59259-688-6:287

Mucosal Immunization with DNA Vaccines

2003· article· en· W3023085700 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. McCluskie, Heather L. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucosal immunityImmunizationImmunologyImmunityMedicineGenitourinary systemTransmission (telecommunications)Immune systemInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mucosal surface area of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary and respiratory tracts is more than 200 times greater than that of the skin and is the primary site of transmission of numerous diseases. The entry of pathogenic organisms at mucosal surfaces can be prevented by mucosal, but not systemic immunity. Vaccines which are delivered by intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous (SC) injection induce strong systemic responses but generally no mucosal immunity. In contrast, vaccines delivered at mucosal surfaces trigger both mucosal (at local and distant sites) and systemic responses (1,2). Other advantages of mucosal immunization include a broader age range of recipients, the vaccines are easy and non-invasive to administer and there is no risk of needle stick injury and cross contamination (3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207