« The Bishop’s Candlesticks » : une certaine tradition de la réception hollywoodienne des Misérables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lorsqu’il s’agit d’évoquer les adaptations des Misérables, l’énoncé le plus évident et le plus attendu est le suivant : c’est le destin de Jean Valjean. Pourtant il existe une toute première tradition cinématographique dans laquelle Les Misérables, c’est l’histoire des «Chandeliers de l’Evêque». Dans cet article, nous allons essayer de retrouver cette tradition, d’exhumer quelques films-jalons, en commençant par l’une des toutes premières adaptations du roman réalisée par Albert Capellani en 1906 ou encore celle de Lewis Milestone en 1953. L’essentiel de notre analyse se concentrera sur ce film dont l’originalité tient au fait qu’il propose une lecture conservatrice -au sens nord-américain du terme- du roman et qu’il constitue l’avatar le plus tardif de la tradition des «Chandeliers de l’Evêque».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".