MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Successful Treatment of Mature T-Cell Lymphoma with Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: The Largest Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

2020· article· en· W3023118053 on OpenAlexaff
Neha Mehta–Shah, Stephanie Teja, Yu Tao, Amanda F. Cashen, Anne Beaven, Önder Alpdoğan, Pierluigi Porcu, Mackenzie Wiggin, Kevin Song, Musa Alzahrani, Parastoo B. Dahi, Alison J. Moskowitz, Sarah McCue Horwitz, Eric D. Jacobsen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaplastic large-cell lymphomaMedicineTransplantationLymphomaAnaplastic lymphoma kinaseInternal medicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationOncologyGastroenterologyPleural effusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Mature T-cell lymphomas (TCL) are an uncommon heterogeneous subset of non-Hodgkin lymphomas for which allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) is considered in the relapsed/refractory setting. Outcomes of alloHCT reported through prior registry data has shown that only 31% of patients (pts) with TCL remain disease free 3 years after alloHCT (Smith et al. JCO2013). However, several single institution studies have shown superior outcomes. Methods: We analyzed the baseline characteristics, treatment history, overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in consecutive patients with mature TCL who received an alloHCT from 1/1/2000- 5/12/2017 at 6 academic institutions. Patients with the following diagnoses were included: peripheral T-cell lymphoma, NOS (PTCL-NOS); angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL); anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) negative; ALCL, ALK positive; ALCL, ALK unknown; adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL); hepatosplenic TCL (HSTCL); extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL); enteropathy-associated TCL (EATL); cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL); primary cutaneous ALCL; subcutaneous panniculitis-like TCL (SPTCL); primary cutaneous gamma/delta TCL (GDTCL); blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). Results: Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. 284 pts were identified with median age of 50 years (17-74). Of these, 269 had known remission status at the time of transplant. At time of alloHCT, 163 (60.5%) were in complete remission (CR), 89 (33.1%) in partial remission (PR), 10 (3.72%) with stable disease, and 7 (2.60%) with progressive disease. 53 pts received an alloHCT in CR1 and 8 in PR1. 102 pts received an alloHCT in CR2 or beyond and 53 in PR2 or beyond (8 and 28 were in CRx and PRx). 49 pts had a prior autologous transplant. The median hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index score was 2 (0-9). The conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 131, reduced intensity/non-myeloablative in 149 and unknown in 4. Donor type was available for 281 patients: 113 matched related, 106 matched unrelated, 24 mismatched, 13 haploidentical donors, 25 cord blood. Following alloHCT, 88 pts have progressed to date at a median of 4.65 months (0.72-88.38). With a median follow-up period for survivors of 49.17 months (0.69-186.51), the OS and PFS rate were 60.1% (95% CI: 53.8-65.7%) and 47.8% (95% CI: 41.7-53.7%) at 2 years. (Figure 1) For the disease specific 2-year PFS please see Table 1. 65.1% of the deaths occurred within 12 months of alloHCT. Of 129 patients who have died, 56 died of lymphoma and 30 died of alloHCT complications (death within 30 days of transplant or due to GvHD). 43 pts had an unknown or other cause of death. In this series, there was no significant difference in outcome for patients with AITL, PTCL-NOS, ALK positive ALCL or ALK negative ALCL which carried a median PFS of 52.2 months (95% CI: 17.9-82.9; p=0.247). The rate of transplant related mortality (TRM) at 1 year was 13.2% (95%CI: 8.3-18.1). Of the 281 pts who had data regarding development of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), 119 (42.3%) developed acute GvHD and 97 (34.5%) developed chronic GvHD. There were no differences in TRM according to recipient age and HCT-CI, (all p-values NS). Response to prior therapy at the time of alloHCT was associated with PFS (p=0.001). (Figure 2) Median PFS for those with PR, stable disease or progressive disease were 36.8 mo, 19.2 mo, 4.96 mo respectively. In contrast, median PFS was not reached for pts in CR at the time of alloHCT. Degree of donor match was associated with cumulative TRM(p=0.012). For patients who underwent matched related, matched unrelated, or mismatched donor alloHCT, cumulative TRM at 6 months was 2.9% (1.5-7.3%), 7.8%(4.3-14.2%), 14.8%(6.8-32%) respectively. 32 of 88 pts who relapsed survive to date with median survival of 3.55 months post relapse (0.07 -78.6 months). Conclusions: We present the largest series of alloHCT in TCL. This study suggests that alloHCT is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with TCL. Response to prior therapy was associated with PFS. Mismatched alloHCTs were associated with higher TRM. While 64% of relapses occur within 12 months following transplant, 53.5% of the patients in this series remain alive. This data supports the curative potential of alloHCT in a patient group with otherwise poor survival and limited treatment options. Download : Download high-res image (244KB) Download : Download full-size image Disclosures Mehta-Shah: Celgene: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding. Beaven: GlaxoSmithKline: Other: Spouse's employment; Celgene: Honoraria. Porcu: Galderma: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Kiowa: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding. Moskowitz: Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Horwitz: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakka-Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; HUYA: Consultancy. Jacobsen: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders researchFrench-language works237,207