MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023131855

How young people are faring: key indicators 2005: an update about the learning and work situation of young Australians

2005· article· en· W3023131855 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Long

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)UnemploymentWorkforceQuarter (Canadian coin)Full-timeEconomic shortageDemographic economicsYouth unemploymentEconomic growthPsychologyPolitical scienceSociologyGeographyEconomicsGovernment (linguistics)Engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report is the seventh in an annual series documenting changes in the learning and work circumstances of young Australians, though it is noted that this year it is being published in a very different policy environment to previous years. The report suggests that improving the education and training of young Australians is more important than ever because of skills shortages and an ageing workforce. A key finding is that each year a substantial proportion of young Australians make a poor transition from school to further study and work. Around 15 per cent of 15 to 19 year-olds are neither in full-time work nor full-time study. Three out of every 10 young Australians has a precarious or negligible attachment to work one year after leaving school. A quarter of Australians aged 18 to 19 are not in full-time education and work. The situation for 20 to 24 year-olds is similar, and these proportions have been almost unchanged for a decade or so. Reflecting on this latest data, the author notes that this is a problem that seemingly will not go away, even in spite of an unprecedented period of sustained economic growth. Many of these young Australians want to work or want to work more. More than a third of those outside the labour force and not studying full-time want a job. Most of the unemployed are seeking a full-time job, even though the trend over the last decade or longer has been from unemployment to part-time work, and most of those with part-time jobs want more hours of work. While the number of full-time jobs has continued to grow for the older population, it has not grown to the same extent for young Australians outside full-time study. Part-time employment has increasingly and for longer become the basis of their economic survival. As part-time work becomes a way of life for more young Australians, it may provide an extended stepping stone to full-time work. Equally, however, it may provide a poor foundation for future skill development or full-time engagement with the labour force. Australia has one of the highest levels of non-student part-time employment among OECD countries. Governments at all levels have initiated policies and programs designed to improve the transition of young people from school to further study and work, but many of the initiatives are relatively recent and their effects may not be seen for some time yet. Indigenous youth are possibly the most disadvantaged group in terms of education and employment. They are significantly under-represented both in universities and in New Apprenticeships, although their participation in the vocational education and training (VET) sector as a whole is better.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207