MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023132266 · doi:10.5206/mf.v5i1.10686

Perspectives croisées sur l’écriture francophone au féminin

2020· article· fr· W3023132266 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nour Aladdine, Sarah Botsford, Stéphanie Ghazarian, Jennifer Johnstone, Mélanie Paré, Kylie Patton

Bibliographic record

VenueMouvances Francophones · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les signataires faisaient partie du même cours et dans l’esprit de la dynamique relationnelle qui animait ce cours, elles ont accepté que des portions de leurs réflexions sur Naomi Fontaine, Amélie Nothomb, Anne Hébert, Maryse Condé, Assia Djebar apparaissent ici conjuguées. Elles ont discuté La Belle Créole, Ombre sultane, Kuessipan, Les Fous de Bassan, Ni d’Eve, ni d’Adam, parfois avec l’aide de ce que nous avions lu de Beauvoir, Cixous, Irigaray. Elles analysent comment les personnages agissent et communiquent sous contrainte, dans l’isolement, sous l’effet d’élans brouillés, abîmés, « balançoire », nous laissant sur une impression de solitude embrassée par les routes, le paysage, le soleil, les « pierres d’eau ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouvances FrancophonesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207