MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023252493 · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0946-9

Functional culture and in vitro genetic and small-molecule manipulation of adult mouse cardiomyocytes

2020· article· en· W3023252493 on OpenAlexafffund
Neal I. Callaghan, Shin‐Haw Lee, Sina Hadipour‐Lakmehsari, Xavier Lee, M. Ahsan Siraj, Amine Driouchi, Christopher M. Yip, Mansoor Husain, Craig A. Simmons, Anthony O. Gramolini

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Biology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heart Research CentreHeart and Stroke FoundationUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkTed Rogers Centre for Heart Research
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of CincinnatiNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTampa Bay Estuary ProgramHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsIn vitroCell biologyBiologyComputational biologyChemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Primary adult cardiomyocyte (aCM) represent the mature form of myocytes found in the adult heart. However, culture of aCMs in particular is challenged by poor survival and loss of phenotype, rendering extended in vitro experiments unfeasible. Here, we establish murine aCM culture methods that enhance survival and maintain sarcomeric structure and Ca 2+ cycling to enable physiologically relevant contractile force measurements. We also demonstrate genetic and small-molecule manipulations that probe mechanisms underlying myocyte functional performance. Together, these refinements to aCM culture present a toolbox with which to advance our understanding of myocardial physiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications BiologySame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207