Infrared Precipitation Estimation Using Convolutional Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infrared (IR) information is fundamental to global precipitation estimation. Although researchers have developed numerous IR-based retrieval algorithms, there is still plenty of scope for promoting their accuracy. This article develops a novel deep learning-based algorithm entitled infrared precipitation estimation using a convolutional neural network (IPEC). Based on the five-channel IR data, the IPEC first identifies the precipitation occurrence and then estimates the precipitation rates at hourly and 0.04° × 0.04° resolutions. The performance of the IPEC is validated using the Stage-IV radar-gauge-combined data and compared to the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks-Cloud Classification System (PERSIANN-CCS) in three subregions over the continental United States (CONUS). The results show that the five-channel input is more efficient in precipitation estimation than the commonly used one-channel input. The IPEC estimates based on the five-channel input show better statistical performance than the PERSIANN-CCS with 34.9% gain in Pearson's correlation coefficient (CC), 38.0% gain in relative bias (BIAS), and 45.2% gain in mean squared error (MSE) during the testing period from June to August 2014 over the central CONUS. Furthermore, the optimized IPEC model is applied in totally independent periods and regions, and still achieves significantly better performance than the PERSIANN-CCS, indicating that the IPEC has a stronger generalization capability. On the whole, this article proves the effectiveness of the convolutional neural network (CNN) combined with the physical multichannel inputs in IR precipitation retrieval. This end-to-end deep learning algorithm shows the potential for serving as an operational technique that can be applied globally and provides a new perspective for the future development of satellite precipitation retrievals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".