MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023509667 · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2007.7.465

Comparison of quarter-plane and two-point boundary value problems: The KdV-equation

2007· article· en· W3023509667 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jerry L. Bona, Hongqiu Chen, Shu-Ming Sun, Bing‐Yu Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersW. M. Keck FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsKorteweg–de Vries equationBoundary value problemPlane (geometry)Mathematical analysisMathematicsBoundary (topology)Point (geometry)Quarter (Canadian coin)Plane waveBoundary valuesPhysicsGeometryOpticsQuantum mechanicsNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with the Korteweg-de Vries equation which models unidirectional propagation of small amplitude long waves in dispersive media. The two-point boundary value problem wherein the wave motion is specified at both ends of a finite stretch of length $L$ of the media of propagation is considered. It is shown that the solution of the two-point boundary value problem converges as $L\rightarrow +\infty$ to the solution of the quarter-plane boundary value problem in which a semi-infinite stretch of the medium is disturbed at its finite end. In addition to its intrinsic interest, our result provides justification for the use of the two-point boundary value problem in numerical studies of the quarter plane problem for the KdV equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - BSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Physics ProblemsFrench-language works237,207