MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023538346 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v12n7p29

Effects of Nutrition on Osteoarthritis in Women Over the 50 Years: Using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) Data

2020· article· en· W3023538346 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kyeong-Rae Kim, Jae-Eun Park, So-Young Lim, Ho Kim, Il‐Tae Jang, Kwang-Yeol Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyMedicineOddsEnvironmental healthMicronutrientOdds ratioGerontologyPublic healthNutrientPhysical therapyInternal medicineAlternative medicineLogistic regressionPopulationPathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are prior articles on osteoarthritis of demographic and nutritional factors, previous studies show a lack of empirical analysis using public data, focusing primarily on predicting or assessing risk factors focusing on demographic characteristics. Since the disease called osteoarthritis itself has yet to be clearly treated, we would like to establish that the preventive medical aspect of osteoarthritis is very important and that prevention through nutrient intake can reduce the social and economic costs of osteoarthritis. We intend to prepare basic data for osteoarthritis by analyzing the prevalence of osteoarthritis in women over the 50 age based on demographic and nutritional characteristics using the 7th National Nutrition Survey data in 2016 and 2017. As results, cholesterol and sodium negatively affect the odds of osteoarthritis and nutrients classified as inorganic reduce the odds of osteoarthritis in 50 age women to 59 years old. In addition, in women over 60 and under 69 years of age, vitamin B has been found to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis and iron has a significant effect on women in their 70s and older. Therefore, these nutrients are ‘micronutrients’ and, among the five major nutrients, were identified as the nutrients that assisted the ‘macronutrients’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health ScienceSame topicNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorFrench-language works237,207