Reaction of tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine and cinnamaldehyde in methanol
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reaction of tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine with excess cinnamaldehyde in CH 3 OH or CD 3 OD, followed using NMR, proceeds via several phosphorus‐containing intermediates, multiple transformations of organic parts, and with the solvent H/D isotope effect on products. In both solvents, one CH 2 OH group of tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine is readily replaced by the cinnamaldehyde moiety to give the primary product, a 1,3‐oxaphosphorinane derivative. Slower replacement of the second CH 2 OH group leads to a mixture of aliphatic and heterocyclic phosphine intermediates in a ratio of ~4:1 in CH 3 OH and ~1:1 in CD 3 OD; both intermediates contain alcohol and aldehyde groups and convert rapidly into intra‐ and intermolecular hemiacetals. The hemiacetals of the aliphatic phosphine rearrange further into an unsymmetrical trialkylphosphine oxide, whereas the hemiacetals of the heterocyclic phosphine react with the third mole of cinnamaldehyde to replace the third CH 2 OH group of tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine. All intermediates and products are formed as mixtures of stereoisomers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it