Etiologic Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke in SARS-COV-2 Virus patients in a cohort of New York City hospitals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective To describe the ischemic stroke subtypes related to COVID-19 in a cohort of NYC hospitals and explore their etiopathogenesis. Background Extra-pulmonary involvement of COVID-19 has been reported in the hepatic, renal and hematological systems. Most neurological manifestations are non-focal, but few have reported the characteristics of ischemic strokes or investigated its pathophysiology. Methods Data were collected prospectively from March 15 to April 15, 2020 from four centers in New York City to review possible ischemic stroke types seen in COVID-19 positive patients. Patient presentation, demographics, other related vascular risk factors, associated laboratory and coagulation markers, as well as imaging and outcomes for consecutive stroke patients positive for SARS-COV2 infection over the period studied were collected. Results In our study, the age range of patients was 25-75 with no significant male preponderance. The median age of LVO patients was 48. Stroke was the presenting and hospitalizing event in 70%. One fifth of patients did not have common risk factors for ischemic stroke and none had atrial fibrillation, coronary or cerebrovascular disease, or were smokers. Half had a poor outcome with 40% ending in mortality (60% in LVO group) and one in a critical condition due ARDS. All had high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio except one who demonstrated some neurological recovery. D-dimer levels showed mild to severe elevation when collected. None of the LVO cases had known cardiac risk factors but two out of five were found to have cardiac abnormalities during their hospitalization. All LVOs had hypercoagulable lab markers especially elevated D-dimer and/or fibrinogen. The LVO patients were younger and sicker with a median age of 46 and mean NIHSS of 24 as opposed to non-LVOs with a median age of 62 and mean NIHSS of 6 respectively. Conclusion COVID-19 related ischemic events can be small vessel, branch emboli or large vessel occlusions. The latter is often associated with either a hypercoagulable state or cardio-embolism. Patient outcomes were worse when multi-organ or pulmonary system failure prevailed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".