Factors associated with health-related quality of life in Japanese patients with hip osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Chronic symptoms related with hip osteoarthritis (OA) can negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The purpose of this study was to examine factors related to a HRQoL measure that considers an Asian lifestyle in Japanese patients with hip OA. Methods: Forty-seven female subjects participated. The dependent variable was the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), which assessed HRQoL. Potential factors were measured as independent variables. After screening, potential variables were entered into a multiple regression analysis to determine which variables were related to HRQoL. Results: In the regression model, knee extension muscle strength on the unaffected side and hip flexion range of motion (ROM) on the affected side were associated with HRQoL. Higher strength and higher ROM were related to greater HRQoL. Conclusion: Results can help health-care providers develop appropriate rehabilitation programs for improving HRQoL in patients with hip OA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".