MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023647800 · doi:10.21083/nrsc.vi13.5570

Objets trouvés d’une reprouvée : les objets d’écriture de Louise Michel en Nouvelle-Calédonie

2020· article· fr· W3023647800 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelle Revue Synergies Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNew Caledonia Indigenous Studies
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce travail examine la correspondance d’exil de Louise Michel et y recense les objets qui permettent à la déportée de poursuivre ses projets d’écriture en Nouvelle-Calédonie​. Ces quelques possessions rendent manifestes les conditions de précarité dans lesquelles écrit l’ancienne Communarde. Les lettres, en plus de montrer la fortune de ces objets, témoignent du minimalisme radical de la militante. Cette qualité explique largement l’ascendant que Michel exerce sur ses camarades exilés avec qui elle partage biens et écrits. Parmi ces déportés, l’on compte Henry Bauër, fils naturel d’Alexandre Dumas. La singularité du caractère de Louise Michel éclaire également la correspondance entretenue avec Victor Hugo. En plus de vers envoyés au poète, Michel expédie des objets naturels, sortes d’emblèmes de son regard sur le monde matériel. Le tout est fragmentaire, résultat des pressions de la surveillance et des remous politiques; bref, ces textes épistolaires sont à l’image de la vie mouvementée de l’auteure. 
 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it