MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3023667421 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v73i2.2981

Conformité du circuit du médicament dans les unités de soins et les cliniques externes : étude observationnelle transversale au sein d’un établissement universitaire de 500 lits

2020· article· fr· W3023667421 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amélie Chabrier, Pauline Rault, Suzanne Atkinson, Jean‐François Bussières

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉContexte : En établissement de santé, le circuit du médicament est complexe, puisqu’il compte plus de 50 étapes. Pour évaluer la conformité du circuit du médicament de notre établissement, nous avons mis en place un processus annuel d’audit.Objectifs : L’objectif principal vise à décrire la conformité de certaines étapes du circuit du medicament (principalement la gestion des médicaments) aux unités de soins et dans les cliniques externes d’un centre hospitalier universitaire mère-enfant. L’objectif secondaire consiste à comparer les résultats à ceux des audits précédents.Méthodes : Il s’agit d’une étude descriptive observationnelle transversal réalisée à l’été 2018 dans les unités de soins (n = 34) et les cliniques externes (n = 28) de l’établissement. Les données ont été recueillies à partir d’une grille d’audit.Résultats : En 2018, le taux de conformité de l’ensemble des unités de soins aux critères mentionnés dans la grille d’audit variait de 32 % à 100 %. Par rapport à l’année précédente, le taux de conformité à 30 critères est demeuré inchangé et celui à quatre critères s’est détérioré. La conformité à 35 % des critères (12/34) était totale à plus de 85 %. En 2018, le taux de conformité de l’ensemble des cliniques externes aux critères mentionnés dans la grille d’audit variait de 0 % à 100 %. Le taux de conformité à un critère s’est amélioré, celui à 21 critères est demeuré inchangé et celui à deux critères s’est détérioré. La conformité à 32 % des critères (9/28) était totale à plus de 85 %. Trente-cinq recommandations ont été formulées au comité pharmacie-soins infirmiers et un rapport personnalisé a été transmis aux gestionnaires.Conclusions : Cette étude descriptive observationnelle transversale décrit le degré de conformité du circuit du médicament relatif à la gestion des médicaments, principalement dans les unités de soins et les cliniques externes. Cette démarche originale à l’initiative du Département de pharmacie a abouti à la formulation de 35 recommandations au comité pharmacie-soins infirmiers, ce qui a permis d’améliorer la sécurité du circuit du médicament dans les unités de soins et les cliniques externes. ABSTRACTBackground: In the hospital setting, the medication-use system is complex, having more than 50 steps. To assess the compliance of the study organization’s medication-use system with established criteria, an annual audit process was developed.Objectives: The primary objective was to describe the compliance of certain steps in the medication-use system (mainly medication management) in care units and outpatient clinics of a mother and child university hospital centre. The secondary objective was to compare the current results with those of previous audits.Methods:This cross-sectional descriptive observational study was carried out in summer 2018 in patient care units (n = 34) and outpatient clinics (n = 28) of the study hospital. Data were collected according to an audit matrix.Results: In 2018, the rate of compliance with audit criteria varied between 32% and 100% for the patient care units. Relative to the previous year, the compliance rate remained unchanged for 30 criteria and worsened for 4 criteria. For 35% of the criteria (12/34), compliance was greater than 85%. In 2018, the rate of compliance with audit criteria varied between 0% and 100% for the outpatient clinics. The compliance rate increased for one criterion, remained unchanged for 21 criteria, and worsened for 2 criteria. For 32% of the criteria (9/28), compliance was more than 85%. Thirty-five recommendations were made to the pharmacy and nursing care committee, and a personalized report was sent to managers.Conclusions:This cross-sectional descriptive observational study reports the degree to which the medication-use system complies with medication management criteria, mainly in patient care units and outpatients’ clinics. This original approach from the Pharmacy Department led to the formulation of 35 recommendations to the pharmacy and nursing care committee, which helped to improve the safety of the medication-use system in patient care units and outpatient clinics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes→French-language works237,207→