A measurable angular distribution for $$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast }{\tau}^{-}{\overline{v}}_{\tau } $$ decays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract At present, the measurements of $$ {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} $$ R D ∗ and RJ/ψ hint at new physics (NP) in $$ b\to c{\tau}^{-}\overline{v} $$ b → c τ − v ¯ decays. The angular distribution of $$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast}\left(\to D\pi \right){\tau}^{-}{\overline{v}}_{\tau } $$ B ¯ → D ∗ → Dπ τ − v ¯ τ would be useful for getting information about the NP, but it cannot be measured. The reason is that the three-momentum $$ {\overrightarrow{p}}_{\tau } $$ p → τ cannot be determined precisely since the decay products of the τ− include an undetected ντ. In this paper, we construct a measurable angular distribution by considering the additional decay τ−→ π−ντ. The full process is $$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast}\left(\to D{\pi}^{\prime}\right){\tau}^{-}\left(\to {\pi}^{-}{v}_{\tau}\right){\overline{v}}_{\tau } $$ B ¯ → D ∗ → D π ′ τ − → π − v τ v ¯ τ , which includes three final-state particles whose three-momenta can be measured: D, π′, π−. The magnitudes and relative phases of all the NP parameters can be extracted from a fit to this angular distribution. One can measure CP-violating angular asymmetries. If one integrates over some of the five kinematic parameters parametrizing the angular distribution, one obtains (i) familiar observables such as the q2 distribution and the D∗ polarization, and (ii) new observables associated with the π− emitted in the τ decay: the forward-backward asymmetry of the π− and the CP-violating triple-product asymmetry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".