MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023783586 · doi:10.21199/wb51.2.8

FIRST RECORD OF THE PURPLE MARTIN BREEDING IN IDAHO

2020· article· en· W3023783586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Austin R. Young, Liam M. Waters

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Birds · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyArchaeologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Th Purple Martin (Progne subis), the largest swallow (Hirundinidae) that is widespread in North America north of Mexico, breeds commonly over much of the eastern U.S. and central Canada (Brown and Tarof 2013). Sparser and oftn isolated breeding populations are scattered through the Pacifi states (Kostka and McAllister 2005, Airola and Williams 2008) and southern British Columbia (Cousens et al. 2005), as well as the interior West from north-central Utah and western Colorado south to northern Mexico (Behle 1968, Doughty and Fergus 2002). Th location of reported breeding nearest to Idaho is about 35 km to the south in northern Utah, where Purple Martins nest mainly in abandoned woodpecker holes in mature aspen or mixed forests near water at high elevations (Hayward 1941, 1958, Brown and Tarof 2013).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern BirdsSame topicHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchFrench-language works237,207