MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023790919 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000000977

Successful Treatment of Superior Oblique Myokymia With Cannabidiol Oil

2020· review· en· W3023790919 on OpenAlexaff
Jingyi Ma, Stéphanie Labbé, Jonathan A. Micieli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOscillopsiaDiplopiaMedicineMyokymiaOphthalmologyHypertropiaAnesthesiaAudiologySurgeryEye movementPhysical medicine and rehabilitationElectromyographyPalsyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Superior oblique myokymia (SOM) is a rare condition characterized by sudden episodes of involuntary, rhythmic, monocular contractions of the superior oblique muscle, resulting in diplopia and oscillopsia (1). Published SOM medical therapies include beta-blockers, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, phenytoin, and botulinum toxin injection (1). However, its low prevalence, unknown etiology, and variable time course make SOM a particularly difficult condition to study and there are currently no well-established treatments. We present a case of SOM successfully treated with cannabidiol (CBD) oil. CASE REPORT A 26-year-old man was referred to the neuro-ophthalmology service for oscillopsia in his right eye. He reported a three-week history of “shaking” of vision in his right eye and intermittent vertical binocular diplopia, both worse when looking down. On examination, he had normal afferent visual function. Slit-lamp examination revealed low-amplitude, high-frequency bursts of incyclotorsion of the right eye. This was more obvious in downgaze and corresponded with his subjective symptoms. Maddox rod testing during episodes of diplopia revealed a right hypotropia that resolved when he was asymptomatic. Extraocular movements were otherwise full and the remainder of his cranial nerves were normal. A clinical diagnosis of right SOM was made and a brain MRI did not show any lesion along the course of the trochlear nerves. The patient underwent unsuccessful treatment with timolol and levobunolol eye drops. After a self-directed literature review and discovering that cannabidiol may reduce seizure frequency in treatment-resistant epilepsy, he self-initiated oral CBD oil 60 mg every 3 hours. He found a predictable response of decreased oscillopsia amplitude and frequency that occurred 30–45 minutes after CBD oil use that lasted for 4 hours. A cannabinoid specialist was consulted and he titrated the CBD oil to 0.7 mL (25 mg CBD 2 mg THC/1 mL) 3 times per day. The oscillopsia continued to resolve in a timely manner after initiation of treatment. The patient continued regularly using CBD oil for a total of 3 months, after which he was essentially symptom free and able to return to work. On a follow-up assessment 7 months later, he was orthophoric and remained symptom-free, only sparingly using CBD oil. DISCUSSION Although SOM is a condition that may resolve spontaneously, we postulate that oral CBD oil played a significant role in our patient's symptom resolution, given the predictable response in his oscillopsia reduction after using CBD oil and the close temporal relationship between symptom relief and CBD oil administration. In addition, the patient was treated unsuccessfully with topical beta-blockers, further reducing the likelihood that improvement of his SOM was spontaneous. Previous reports on the use of CBD oil are limited to an online discussion forum, where there was an anecdotal report of persistent SOM successfully treated with CBD oil in 2018 (2). She has been symptom-free for over a year. For other involuntary ocular movement disorders, there are 2 published cases of nystagmus suppression after smoking cannabis (3,4). Schon et al (3) report a patient with pendular nystagmus in the context of MS who experienced dramatic dampening of his oscillopsia 30 minutes after smoking 2 cannabis-containing cigarettes. This effect lasted 4–5 hours, and there was a correlation of therapeutic benefit with serum cannabinoid levels. Dell'Osso also observed a patient with congenital nystagmus whose nystagmus dampened after smoking cannabis (4). Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the most well-studied cannabinoid, but is well known for its psychoactive affects. However, CBD is not associated with psychoactivity and does not affect memory or motor function (5). It has been reported to be of benefit in a number of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease, epilepsy as well as anxiety and depression (5). It may also offer therapeutic benefits for spasticity, pain, and sleep disorders (5). The exact mechanism by which CBD exerts its anticonvulsant effects is unknown but may be related to its ability to reduce neuronal excitability through modulation of intracellular calcium (6). Furthermore, THC and CBD act on cannabinoid receptors of the endocannabinoid system, specifically cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2) receptors, which are present in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Cannabidiol was identified as a negative allosteric modulator of the CB1 receptor and is hypothesized to have the potential to treat central nervous system disorders while avoiding the adverse effects associated with THC's orthosteric agonism (7). Other receptors through which CBD may exert its effects include the transient receptor potential of vanilloid type 1 channel, 5-HT1A serotonergic receptor, and alpha-1 and alpha-2 glycine receptors (6). Extensive study in this area is ongoing (5). Further study in a larger patient group is needed before its place in the SOM treatment algorithm can be established. At the present time, CBD oil can be used after failure of traditional treatment such as beta-blockers, carbamazepine, or gabapentin, or can even be considered as initial therapy due to its favorable safety profile and lack of psychoactivity. Factors limiting its use are cost and availability in certain regions. Significant adverse effects have not yet been described with its use (5). SOM is a challenging condition to treat and response to therapy varies depending on the individual. This case contributes an additional therapeutic agent that may be trialed in SOM and adds to the literature on the role of CBD in neurological conditions. STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP Category 1: a. Conception and design: S. Labbé and J. A. Micieli: b. Acquisition of data: J. Ma, S. Labbé, and J. A. Micieli; c. Analysis and interpretation of data: J. Ma and S. Labbé. Category 2: a. Drafting the manuscript: J. Ma; b. Revising it for intellectual content: S. Labbé and J. A. Micieli. Category 3: a. Final approval of the completed manuscript: J. A. Micieli.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologySame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207