MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023803301 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1063

SAT-017 Relationship Between Vitamin D Levels and Signs of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

2020· article· en· W3023803301 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anastasia Smykalova, Svetlana Kalinchenko, Aigul Safi, М.Р. Оразов, Alexander N. Nizhnik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolycystic ovaryVitamin D and neurologyvitamin D deficiencyInfertilityInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyOvulationOvaryHormonePhysiologyEtiologyObesityPregnancyBiologyInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An analysis of the structure of the causes of infertility shows that up to almost 25% of women of reproductive age ovulation disorders are observed. Hormonal disorders leading to the absence of ovulation, began to play a leading role in the etiology of infertility, special vitamin D deficiency, while today it has been established that its D receptors (VDR) are localized in most organs, including reproductive ones. VDR affect the expression of 1000 genes and play a crucial role in the implementation of sex hormones function. The aim of the study was to assess the vitamin D level in women of reproductive age, depending on the presence of signs of PCOS and waist circumference (WC). 71 women from 19 to 44 years old were examined of these, 41 patients were diagnosed with PCOS and impaired ovulatory function, in 30 patients the ovulatory cycle was preserved, and signs of PCOS were not detected. The level of vitamin 25 (OH) D3 in the serum of the subjects was evaluated by tandem chromato-mass spectrometry at the ArchiMed clinic of new medical technologies, Moscow. In the recommendations of the Canadian “The Vitamin D society”, 40-60 ng/ml the optimal level of serum vitamin D, a concentration of 20-40 ng/ml insufficiency, <20 ng/ml as a deficiency. Vitamin D deficiency was detected in 57% of women in both groups, with a pronounced deficiency (<10 ng/ml) in 17%, insufficiency was observed in 43% of cases, a sufficient level was not detected in any of the subjects. The average level of vitamin D in patients with PCOS was 18.2 (2 to 32.3) ng/ml, the value in patients without signs of PCOS was 18.5 (6.8 to 31) ng/ml. Comparison of the vitamin D value with WC showed that in women with PCOS with an WC <80 cm the value of this indicator was 18.8 ng/ml, and for WC ≥ 80 cm it was statistically significantly lower - 13.3 ng/ml (p<0.05). Conclusion. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among patients of reproductive age, with no differences in the magnitude of this indicator depending on the presence of signs of PCOS and persistent ovulation. Difference was established between the levels of vitamin D in patients with PCOS depending on the waist circumference - its insufficiency increases with an increase in WC. The results of the study suggest that the deficiency of vitamin D in the body increases with the aggravation of hormonal dysfunction in PCOS, which should be taken into account by specialists during the management of this category of patients and the treatment of infertility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207