Analisis Efisiensi Kinerja Pendidik terhadap Hasil Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani pada Siswa Sekolah
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAKSI: Pendidikan jasmani adalah proses pengembangan dan peningkatan kemampuan organik, neuro-muskuler, interperatif, sosial, dan emosional melalui kegiatan fisik. Umumnya, kajian pendidikan sebatas mengungkapkan tentang efektivitas proses belajar-mengajar, tetapi efisiensi proses belajar-mengajar belum banyak dikaji, khususnya dalam bidang pendidikan jasmani. Penelitian ini berupaya untuk meneliti efisiensi pengajaran pendidikan jasmani melalui analisis terhadap kinerja guru pendidikan jasmani dalam kegiatan belajar-mengajar, yang meliputi analisis terhadap media yang digunakan, metode, serta model belajar yang diterapkan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode analisis dokumen. Data diperoleh dari dokumen laporan penelitian empat tahun terakhir; sedangkan populasinya adalah siswa SD (Sekolah Dasar), SLTP (Sekolah Lanjutan Tingkat Pertama), dan SLTA (Sekolah Lanjutan Tingkat Atas) di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Berdasarkan analisis kinerja pendidik, umumnya pendidik pada jenjang pendidikan SD, SLTP, dan SLTA telah mampu menerapkan prinsip efisiensi kinerja dan meningkatkan kualitas kinerjanya yang tercermin dari nilai uji signifikansi pada setiap jenjang pendidikan.KATA KUNCI: Analisis Efisiensi; Pendidikan Jasmani; Kinerja Pendidik; Siswa Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah. ABSTRACT: “Efficiency Analysis of Teacher Performance towards the Physical Education Learning Outcomes in School Students”. Physical education is the process of developing and increasing organic, neuro-muscular, interperative, social, and emotional abilities through physical activity. Generally, studies of education are limited to revealing the effectiveness of the teaching and learning process, but the efficiency of the teaching and learning process has not been widely studied, especially in the field of physical education. This study attemps to investigate the efficiency of physical education teaching and learning through analyses on physical education teachers’ performances in delivering classroom instructions, which involves analyses on the developed media and the applied learning methods and models. The research was conducted using the method of document analysis. Data are obtained from the research report document in the last four years; while the population was students of Elementary School, Junior High School, and Senior High School in the West Java Province. Based on the analysis of educator performance, generally educators at the Elementary School, Junior High School, and Senior High School have been able to apply the principles of efficiency and improve the quality performance, which are reflected in the value of the significance test at every level of education.KEY WORD: Efficiency Analysis; Physical Education; Educator Performance; Students of Primary and Secondary Schools. About the Authors: Ricky Wirasasmita, M.Pd. dan Erry Hendriawan, M.Pd. adalah Dosen di STKIP (Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan) Pasundan, Jalan Permana No.32-B Cimahi 40512, Jawa Barat, Indonesia. Untuk kepentingan akademik, Penulis bisa dihubungi dengan alamat emel: rickywirasasmita@yahoo.comSuggested Citation: Wirasasmita, Ricky Erry Hendriawan. (2020). “Analisis Efisiensi Kinerja Pendidik terhadap Hasil Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani pada Siswa Sekolah” in MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan, Volume 5(1), March, pp.75-90. Bandung, Indonesia: UPI [Indonesia University of Education] Press, ISSN 2527-3868 (print) and 2503-457X (online). Article Timeline: Accepted (January 5, 2020); Revised (February 9, 2020); and Published (March 30, 2020).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it