MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023831873 · doi:10.17509/mimbardik.v5i1.24152

Analisis Efisiensi Kinerja Pendidik terhadap Hasil Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani pada Siswa Sekolah

2020· article· id· W3023831873 on OpenAlexaff
Ricky Wirasasmita, Erry Hendriawan

Bibliographic record

VenueMIMBAR PENDIDIKAN · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRAKSI: Pendidikan jasmani adalah proses pengembangan dan peningkatan kemampuan organik, neuro-muskuler, interperatif, sosial, dan emosional melalui kegiatan fisik. Umumnya, kajian pendidikan sebatas mengungkapkan tentang efektivitas proses belajar-mengajar, tetapi efisiensi proses belajar-mengajar belum banyak dikaji, khususnya dalam bidang pendidikan jasmani. Penelitian ini berupaya untuk meneliti efisiensi pengajaran pendidikan jasmani melalui analisis terhadap kinerja guru pendidikan jasmani dalam kegiatan belajar-mengajar, yang meliputi analisis terhadap media yang digunakan, metode, serta model belajar yang diterapkan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode analisis dokumen. Data diperoleh dari dokumen laporan penelitian empat tahun terakhir; sedangkan populasinya adalah siswa SD (Sekolah Dasar), SLTP (Sekolah Lanjutan Tingkat Pertama), dan SLTA (Sekolah Lanjutan Tingkat Atas) di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Berdasarkan analisis kinerja pendidik, umumnya pendidik pada jenjang pendidikan SD, SLTP, dan SLTA telah mampu menerapkan prinsip efisiensi kinerja dan meningkatkan kualitas kinerjanya yang tercermin dari nilai uji signifikansi pada setiap jenjang pendidikan.KATA KUNCI: Analisis Efisiensi; Pendidikan Jasmani; Kinerja Pendidik; Siswa Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah. ABSTRACT: “Efficiency Analysis of Teacher Performance towards the Physical Education Learning Outcomes in School Students”. Physical education is the process of developing and increasing organic, neuro-muscular, interperative, social, and emotional abilities through physical activity. Generally, studies of education are limited to revealing the effectiveness of the teaching and learning process, but the efficiency of the teaching and learning process has not been widely studied, especially in the field of physical education. This study attemps to investigate the efficiency of physical education teaching and learning through analyses on physical education teachers’ performances in delivering classroom instructions, which involves analyses on the developed media and the applied learning methods and models. The research was conducted using the method of document analysis. Data are obtained from the research report document in the last four years; while the population was students of Elementary School, Junior High School, and Senior High School in the West Java Province. Based on the analysis of educator performance, generally educators at the Elementary School, Junior High School, and Senior High School have been able to apply the principles of efficiency and improve the quality performance, which are reflected in the value of the significance test at every level of education.KEY WORD: Efficiency Analysis; Physical Education; Educator Performance; Students of Primary and Secondary Schools. About the Authors: Ricky Wirasasmita, M.Pd. dan Erry Hendriawan, M.Pd. adalah Dosen di STKIP (Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan) Pasundan, Jalan Permana No.32-B Cimahi 40512, Jawa Barat, Indonesia. Untuk kepentingan akademik, Penulis bisa dihubungi dengan alamat emel: rickywirasasmita@yahoo.comSuggested Citation: Wirasasmita, Ricky Erry Hendriawan. (2020). “Analisis Efisiensi Kinerja Pendidik terhadap Hasil Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani pada Siswa Sekolah” in MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan, Volume 5(1), March, pp.75-90. Bandung, Indonesia: UPI [Indonesia University of Education] Press, ISSN 2527-3868 (print) and 2503-457X (online). Article Timeline: Accepted (January 5, 2020); Revised (February 9, 2020); and Published (March 30, 2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMIMBAR PENDIDIKANSame topicSports and Physical Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207