Quand la recherche-action-médiation édifie des espacesde solidarité féministes Nords-Suds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article illustre la construction d’une mobilisation et d’une solidarité internationales liées aux préoccupations et aux luttes féministes de femmes dans une douzaine de pays des Nords et des Suds, de 2015 à 2018, à partir d’un projet de recherche-action-médiation intitulé « Femmes et féminismes en dialogue ». Les auteures proposent une analyse réflexive sur ce processus de recherche, processus pour lequel elles se sont inspirées des perspectives intersectionnelle, interculturelle et narrative avec un accent sur l’expression artistique. Il en résulte, d’une part, le tissage de solides réseaux féministes transnationaux et interculturels et, d’autre part, l’expérimentation d’une démarche méthodologique originale de recherche-actionmédiation ouvrant des perspectives d’intervention et de médiations interculturelles porteuses de changement social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".