MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023886815 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.2080

SAT-LB302 From Urolithiasis to Genetic Testing: An Unusual Presentation of MEN-4 Syndrome

2020· article· en· W3023886815 on OpenAlexaff
Bader N. Alamri, Laura Palma, Sero Andonian, William D. Foulkes, Juan Rivera

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrimary hyperparathyroidismMultiple endocrine neoplasiaInternal medicineParathyroidectomyEndocrinologyHypercalciuriaParathyroid adenomaHyperparathyroidismAdenomaGNAS complex locusThyroidMEN1Parathyroid hormoneGastroenterologyCalciumEndocrine systemHormoneChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background:Germline mutations in the CDKN1B gene are responsible for Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 4 (MEN 4) syndrome (Alrezk et al. 2017). Around 20 cases have been reported to date. Here, we report on a new MEN4 family which possibly extends the phenotypic spectrum attributable to germline mutations in CDKN1B. Clinical Case: A 56-year-old female presented with urolithiasis & was found to have hypercalcemia (serum calcium of 2.76 mmol/l ref. 2.12-2.62 mmol/l). Workup was in keeping with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) (PTH 28.7 pmol/l ref. 1.50-9.30 pmol/l; phosphorus 0.89 mmol/l ref. 0.80-1.45 mmol/l). Sestamibi & US of the neck revealed no clear parathyroid adenoma. Two incidental thyroid nodules were benign on FNA cytology. The patient underwent neck exploration & a single enlarged parathyroid gland was removed. Pathology showed an enlarged hypercellular gland. Her calcium & PTH normalized after surgery but recurrence was documented a year later. Her family history was significant for PHPT in two brothers & a history of kidney stones in a third brother. Multi-gene panel testing (CASR, CDC73, CDKN1B, MEN1, RET, Invitae Corp.) revealed a pathogenic variant (PV) in CDKN1B (c.215delG). The patient underwent a 2 ½ parathyroidectomy with subsequent normalization of her calcium & PTH. Further work-up showed a 4.5mm non-secreting pituitary adenoma. Plasma metanephrines & NE were intermittently elevated. Serum gastrin was also mildly elevated 83 pmol/l (<53 pmol/l). A Ga68-DOTATATE PET scan was negative. Her 23-year-old daughter tested positive for the familial PV. She is asymptomatic & has normal calcium & PTH; pituitary function is normal except for an elevated IGF-1 at 63.9 nmol/l (ref 13.3- 42.6 nmol/l) with borderline growth hormone during OGTT (0.40 ug/l). Her pituitary MRI was normal. One brother with history of prostate cancer, PHPT & partial parathyroidectomy has tested positive for the familial CDKN1B variant. A second brother was also found to carry the familial variant & was clinically asymptomatic.Endocrinological workup has revealed he has PHPT, elevated chromogranin A at 196.2 ng/ml (ref <=82), calcitonin at 25 ng/l (normal <=9 ng/l), IFG1 (35.3 nmol/L ref. 13-21) but normal plasma metanephrines. An MRI of the sella shows an 8mm hypoenhancing lesion. On CT, a retroperitoneal hyperenhancing 4cm mass adjacent to the left ilio-psoas was seen, in keeping with a paraganglioma; additionally, he has a congenital left atrophic kidney & ureter. Two additional brothers; one with history of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, PHPT & partial parathyroidectomy & a second brother, also with prostate cancer & recurrent renal stones, have yet to be tested. Conclusions: A new MEN4 family is described here which expands the spectrum of clinical manifestations of this syndrome. Of great interest in our cases is the presence of paraganglioma, urological malformation, & pre-clinical GH/IGF1 elevation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207