EHRA/HRS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus on atrial cardiomyopathies: Definition, characterization, and clinical implication
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Post-publication record
- Nature
- Reinstatement
- Reason
- Retract and Replace;Temporary Removal;
- Date
- 6/10/2016 0:00
- Flagged by OpenAlex?
- No — Retraction Watch records this, and OpenAlex does not flag it.
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Heart Rhythm
- Topic
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- Université de MontréalMcGill UniversityMontreal Heart Institute
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- Keywords
- MedicineCardiologyLawInternal medicinePolitical science
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no