Les enregistrements sonores du musée national des Arts et Traditions populaires aux Archives nationales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dès la constitution de la phonothèque au musée national des Arts et Traditions populaires, la question du statut juridique des enregistrements de terrain liés à la tradition orale collective se pose. Cet article évoque la manière dont cette question a été appréhendée par les chercheurs à l’époque, notamment Claudie Marcel-Dubois et Maguy Andral, collectrices majeures en même temps que responsables du service, et les incidences que cela a eues, jadis, en termes de diffusion, particulièrement restreinte par le passé en raison d’une vision particulière pour ne pas dire personnelle des responsables. La question se pose en des termes différents dès lors que ces enregistrements sont aujourd’hui conservés aux Archives nationales, institution patrimoniale ayant pour mission de les mettre à disposition du public et cela d’autant que ces archives sont à la base de projets de valorisation via internet qui obligent à s’interroger sur la législation actuelle en termes de droit d’auteur et de droits voisins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".