La radio comme vecteur d’identité culturelle : le cas de la politique canadienne de radiodiffusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This contribution aims at highlighting the cultural role played by the radio in Canada, as set out by the Canadian broadcasting policy. Cultural identity is a very complex phenomenon, which can be analysed from different perspectives: historical, anthropological and psychological, for instance. According to the discursive perspective, identity and cultural items can be observed through the analysis of discursive formulation and argumentation, as well as the identification of terminological, lexical and stylistic choices. On the basis of the analysis of the fundamental principles set out by the Canadian broadcasting Act (1991), as well as the integration of a selection of documents published by the CRTC (Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission) on its official website, this study will be focused on the observation of those discursive elements which have been deployed in order to define the radio as a Canadian cultural project. This analysis will be completed by the identification of some cultural and linguistic items, which shows that the above-mentioned principles established by the Canadian broadcasting policy have been taken into account with respect to the elaboration of Canadian programming content offered by Radio-Canada. In conclusion, some research questions will be raised in order to suggest new avenues for the study of the cultural and political role played by the radio in the present (and future) context of globalization, in the light of modern technological developments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".