MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023967281 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2020.2988399

A Dual-Polarization Silicon-Photonic Coherent Transmitter Supporting 552 Gb/s/wavelength

2020· article· en· W3023967281 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelrahman H. Ahmed, Abdellatif El Moznine, Daihyun Lim, Yangjin Ma, Alexander Rylyakov, Sudip Shekhar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrature amplitude modulationPhase-shift keyingTotal harmonic distortionTransmitterPhysicsOptoelectronicsPhotonicsSwingOpticsMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageEngineeringBit error rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coherent optical links improve spectral efficiency over their intensity-modulation direct-detect (IM-DD) counterparts using advanced modulation schemes such as quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) and quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), and by utilizing dual polarization (DP) of light. This increase in spectral efficiency also leads to stringent requirements for the link components. The transmitter (TX) must simultaneously achieve high bandwidth (BW), linearity, output swing, and reliability. In this article, we present a silicon-photonic Mach-Zehnder modulator-based optical TX on an Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) process, and linear, high-swing SiGe drivers on 130-nm BiCMOS process. The output stage of the driver uses a voltage breakdown enhancement technique to ensure the reliability of the TX. A resistor-based capacitor splitting technique is introduced, and aided by other methods such as zero-peaking and degeneration, the targeted gain, BW, swing, and linearity for the driver are realized. The driver achieves a differential swing of 6 V peak-to-peak, a total harmonic distortion (THD) of 3.6%, and more than 40 GHz of electrical BW. Co-designed and co-packaged with the silicon-photonic modulators, the TX achieves 272 Gb/s/wavelength with DP-16 QAM at 6-V peak-to-peak driver swing and exceeds 0.5 Tb/s/wavelength data rates with DP-16 QAM at 2.4-V peak-to-peak driver swing. The low-cost, compact, and all-Si/SiGe design matches the required optical SNR performance of LiNbO3 modulators with III-V drivers at 34 Gbaud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207