MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The role of posterior parietal cortex in the regulation of saccadic eye movements

2011· book· en· W302403239 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Paré, Michael C. Dorris

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVisual perception and processing mechanisms
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaccadePosterior parietal cortexSaccadic maskingNeuroscienceEye movementSensory systemPrimateCortex (anatomy)PsychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is a node within the cerebral ‘higher-order’ network that has no clear homologue in non-primate mammals and is fully defined only in catarrhine primates, which include old world monkeys and hominoids. The late coming of the PPC in the eye movement circuit and the absence of an unequivocal role in saccade preparation and production suggests that the PPC should only be viewed as an innovation to enhance the sensory guidance and flexible control of visual behaviour. In line with this idea is the evidence that the lateral intraparietal area integrates sensory and goal-directed information into a map wherein representations of spatial locations can be maintained and selected as saccade targets through decision processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicVisual perception and processing mechanismsFrench-language works237,207