MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024064267 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.04.027

Commentary: Patience is a virtue

2020· editorial· en· W3024064267 on OpenAlexaff
Christoph Haller

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtiologyScopusMedicinePopulationCirculatory systemPediatricsMEDLINEInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central MessageMyocardial recovery can occur late during mechanical support despite an unfavorable etiology of ventricular dysfunction.See Article page 89. Myocardial recovery can occur late during mechanical support despite an unfavorable etiology of ventricular dysfunction. See Article page 89. Mechanical assist devices are increasingly establishing their role in the treatment of pediatric heart failure. Since the inception of the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PEDIMACS), more than 500 durable and temporary devices have been implanted, with a 74% survival at 6 months according to this registry.1Morales D.L.S. Rossano J.W. VanderPluym C. Lorts A. Cantor R. St Louis J.D. et al.Third annual pediatric interagency registry for mechanical circulatory support (pedimacs) report: preimplant characteristics and outcomes.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 107: 993-1004Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar However, mechanical support for these patients faces unique challenges, driven by the heterogeneity of the pediatric population, off-label use of devices approved for adults, and limited economic appeal for the development of pediatric-specific devices. Patients age <1 year are at particularly high risk and have the highest mortality while on support. Recovery on mechanical support is particularly rare in both children and adults.1Morales D.L.S. Rossano J.W. VanderPluym C. Lorts A. Cantor R. St Louis J.D. et al.Third annual pediatric interagency registry for mechanical circulatory support (pedimacs) report: preimplant characteristics and outcomes.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 107: 993-1004Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar,2Teuteberg J.J. Cleveland Jr., J.C. Cowger J. Higgins R.S. Goldstein D.J. Keebler M. et al.The Society of Thoracic Surgeons intermacs 2019 annual report: the changing landscape of devices and indications.Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 109: 649-660Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (163) Google Scholar Thus, it is all the more encouraging to see reports of successful assist device weaning in the very young, which can potentially help identify both optimal therapeutic strategies and the patients that will benefit the most. In this issue of the Journal, Philip and colleagues3Philip J. Machado D. Shih R. Shenoy A. Ebraheem M. Sullivan K. et al.Myocardial recovery following pulsatile biventricular assist device support in infants: report of 2 cases.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 5: 89-92Google Scholar present 2 cases of relatively late ventricular functional recovery on biventricular paracorporeal pulsatile assist devices in patients age <1 year.3Philip J. Machado D. Shih R. Shenoy A. Ebraheem M. Sullivan K. et al.Myocardial recovery following pulsatile biventricular assist device support in infants: report of 2 cases.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 5: 89-92Google Scholar Both patients showed gradual improvement in left ventricular function and indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume and were subsequently evaluated for ventricular assist device (VAD) weaning with a structured weaning trial over the course of 5 days. Before weaning, invasive hemodynamic data were acquired by catheterization to further objectify adequacy of ventricular function. Follow-up confirmed sustained recovery at 18 and 21 months after VAD removal. Recovery of ventricular function on durable mechanical support is not unheard of in the pediatric population. Patients on durable assist devices have lower recovery rates compared with patients on temporary devices, reflecting the differing indications for support.1Morales D.L.S. Rossano J.W. VanderPluym C. Lorts A. Cantor R. St Louis J.D. et al.Third annual pediatric interagency registry for mechanical circulatory support (pedimacs) report: preimplant characteristics and outcomes.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 107: 993-1004Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar Recovery rates also depend on age and underlying diagnosis, with patients age <2 years and those with nonchronic conditions, such as myocarditis, have a greater likelihood of successful assist device weaning4Miera O. Germann M. Cho M.Y. Photiadis J. Delmo Walter E.M. Hetzer R. et al.Bridge to recovery in children on ventricular assist devices—protocol, predictors of recovery, and long-term follow-up.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018; 37: 1459-1466Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar; however, the 2 cases reported by Philip and colleagues have characteristics that make functional recovery less likely. Successful long-term VAD support aimed at recovery and subsequent explantation has been shown in and advocated for the pediatric population.5Adachi I. Burki S. Fraser Jr., C.D. Current status of pediatric ventricular assist device support.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2017; 20: 2-8Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar Although Philip and colleagues indicate that recovery is commonly seen early after assist device implantation, types of myocardial responses to ventricular unloading must be taken into consideration. Early recovery is commonly seen in patients with nonchronic etiologies, such as postoperative stunning, myocarditis, and temporary ischemic insult. However, longer-term unloading strategies have shown structural remodeling with reduced fibrosis and increased cardiomyocyte numbers even in patients with chronic etiologies, such as dilative cardiomyopathy.6Kasten J. Rakheja D. Zhang S. Thankavel P. Das B.B. Reverse histologic remodeling after mechanical unloading of failing hearts in children with dilated cardiomyopathy.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017; 36: 1268-1271Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar Whether myocardial recovery is improved on pulsatile support compared with continuous-flow devices remains unclear,6Kasten J. Rakheja D. Zhang S. Thankavel P. Das B.B. Reverse histologic remodeling after mechanical unloading of failing hearts in children with dilated cardiomyopathy.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017; 36: 1268-1271Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar,7Krabatsch T. Schweiger M. Dandel M. Stepanenko A. Drews T. Potapovkjl E. et al.Is bridge to recovery more likely with pulsatile left ventricular assist devices than with nonpulsatile flow systems?.Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 91: 1335-1340Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar but it is well established that a subgroup of patients may qualify for a bridge-to-recovery strategy. Unfortunately, we lack clear identifiers of patients likely to recover on long-term mechanical support. More granular data are needed on the likelihood of sustained recovery to guide clinical decision making. Until then, clinicians have to stay vigilant, closely following patients on mechanical assist devices throughout their time on support. VAD programs must ensure that proper protocols are in place not only to assess patients with signs of myocardial recovery for potential weaning, but also to optimize support strategies to improve recovery itself. Diligent analysis and reporting of our experiences are essential. The most important conclusion to be drawn from the report by Philip and colleagues is that recovery can occur late even in patients on a long-term strategy not primarily aimed at recovery. Patience is the virtue needed both to gain a better understanding of the pathophysiology of myocardial recovery and to identify weaning candidates on long-term mechanical support. Myocardial recovery following pulsatile biventricular assist device support in infants: Report of 2 casesJTCVS TechniquesVol. 5PreviewUse of pulsatile ventricular assist devices (VAD) is a well-established strategy for supporting children with end-stage heart failure (HF), as a bridge to heart transplant. In 2005, Stiller and colleagues1 described a cohort of 73 pediatric patients managed using Excor pumps (Berlin Heart Inc, Woodlands, Tex), of whom 12.5% were successfully weaned of support. Since then, there have been multiple reports of successful pulsatile VAD weans in children.2,3 Myocardial recovery has been usually reported within a window of 1 to 2 weeks, on extracorporeal support and longer on VAD support. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS TechniquesSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207