MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024085879 · doi:10.35753/rchsi.v2i1.85

Curative-intent surgery for pancreatic tumors: a review of 3,386 procedures from the Brazilian National Health System

2020· review· en· W3024085879 on OpenAlexaff
Marco Antonio O. Lessa, Benjamin Haaland, Gilberto Lopes, Lucas Vieira dos Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Científica Hospital Santa Izabel · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative and Oncologic Care
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLOPESGeneral surgeryHumanitiesSurgeryArtPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publicado no Journal of Global Oncology. Volume 3, Issue 1, February 2017. Com o mesmo título. Autores: Lucas Vieira dos Santos, Marco Antonio O. Lessa, João Paulo S. N. Lima, Benjamin Haaland, Gilberto de Lima Lopes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Científica Hospital Santa IzabelSame topicPalliative and Oncologic CareFrench-language works237,207