MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024108633

An exploration of women athletes' self-compassion, sport performance perceptions, and well-being around an athlete-identified important competitive event

2019· article· en· W3024108633 on OpenAlexaffabout
Margo E. K. Adam, Abimbola O. Eke, Leah J. Ferguson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesPsychologyCompetitive athletesCompassionPerceptionSocial psychologySport psychologySelf-compassionCriticismFraming (construction)Applied psychologyPerspective (graphical)Clinical psychologyPolitical scienceEngineeringMindfulnessMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Women athletes have expressed hesitation regarding adopting self-compassion in sport, stating that self-compassion may lead to complacency while self-criticism helps them achieve their goals in sport (Ferguson et al., 2014; Sutherland et al., 2014). However, quantitative research has identified that self-compassion is, and self-criticism is not, related to women athletes' sport performance perceptions (Killham et al., 2018). The contrasting findings suggest that the relationship between self-compassion and sport performance perceptions is complex. Moreover, perceived importance of competitive events might further impact how athletes perceive and relate to their sport performance experiences. The current study adopted a qualitative collective case study approach to explore and describe women athletes' self-compassion, sport performance perceptions around an athlete-identified important competitive event. Nine competitive women athletes between 19 and 27 years participated in one-on-one interviews before and after their self-identified event. Data were analyzed and are represented by a holistic case description, one overarching theme Continuing to Excel in Sport, and two sub-themes: (i) Re-framing Criticism and (ii) A Determined Approach. The generated themes indicate that the athletes benefit from a self-compassionate perspective during the preparing, competing, and reflecting stages of their important competitive events. Overall, the results highlight that women athletes utilize self-compassion to promote their sport performance perceptions when at different times and for a variety of reasons around their important competitive events to excel in sport. This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).Acknowledgments: This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository)Same topicMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFrench-language works237,207