Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les plateformes et les logiciels libres sont d’un apport précieux pour l’édition scientifique. Cet article présente un retour d’expérience sur l’usage d’un dépôt institutionnel de textes dans le cadre d’un partenariat international de recherche sur l’histoire et l’esthétique du cinéma visant à créer une encyclopédie raisonnée des techniques en ligne (Québec, France et Suisse). Plus justement, il s’agit de réfléchir à l’articulation entre une bibliographie collaborative (Zotero), un dépôt (Papyrus étant la solution proposée par l’Université de Montréal) et l’interface publique d’une Encyclopédie (CMS Omeka S) dans un environnement libre et ouvert. À la clé : une meilleure accessibilité aux publications des chercheurs en sciences humaines et sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.026 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it