MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Validated Model for Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Prediction in Pediatric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

2020· article· en· W3024147252 on OpenAlexafffund
Anastasia Miron, Myriam Lafrenière‐Roula, Chun‐Po Steve Fan, Andréea Dragulescu, Tanya Papaz, Cedric Manlhiot, Beth D. Kaufman, Ryan J. Butts, Letizia Gardin, Elizabeth A. Stephenson, Taylor S. Howard, Pete F. Aziz, Seshadri Balaji, Virginie Beauséjour Ladouceur, Lee Benson, Steven D. Colan, Justin Godown, Heather Henderson, Jodie Ingles, Aamir Jeewa, John L. Jefferies, Ashwin K. Lal, Jacob Mathew, Emilie Jean‐St‐Michel, Michelle Michels, Stephanie J. Nakano, Iacopo Olivotto, John J. Parent, Alexandre C. Pereira, Christopher Semsarian, Robert Whitehill, Samuel G. Wittekind, Mark W. Russell, Jennifer Conway, Marc E. Richmond, Chet Villa, Robert G. Weintraub, Joseph W. Rossano, Paul F. Kantor, Carolyn Y. Ho, Seema Mital

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchStollery Children's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
FundersUniversidade de São PauloMurdoch Children's Research InstituteMedical Research CouncilHealth Science Center, University of TennesseeChildren’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research InstituteChildren's Hospital ColoradoCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterNational Health and Medical Research CouncilChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity of SydneyChildren's Healthcare of AtlantaBrigham and Women's HospitalHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicineHypertrophic cardiomyopathySudden cardiac deathInternal medicineCardiologyImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorCardiomyopathyVentricular tachycardiaHazard ratioCohortSudden deathProportional hazards modelConfidence intervalHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is the leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in children and young adults. Our objective was to develop and validate a SCD risk prediction model in pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to guide SCD prevention strategies. METHODS: In an international multicenter observational cohort study, phenotype-positive patients with isolated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy <18 years of age at diagnosis were eligible. The primary outcome variable was the time from diagnosis to a composite of SCD events at 5-year follow-up: SCD, resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest, and aborted SCD, that is, appropriate shock following primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Competing risk models with cause-specific hazard regression were used to identify and quantify clinical and genetic factors associated with SCD. The cause-specific regression model was implemented using boosting, and tuned with 10 repeated 4-fold cross-validations. The final model was fitted using all data with the tuned hyperparameter value that maximizes the c-statistic, and its performance was characterized by using the c-statistic for competing risk models. The final model was validated in an independent external cohort (SHaRe [Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry], n=285). RESULTS: score, peak left ventricular outflow tract gradient, and presence of a pathogenic variant. Unlike in adults, left ventricular outflow tract gradient had an inverse association, and family history of SCD had no association with SCD. Clinical and clinical/genetic models were developed to predict 5-year freedom from SCD. Both models adequately discriminated between patients with and without SCD events with a c-statistic of 0.75 and 0.76, respectively, and demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed events in the primary and validation cohorts (validation c-statistic 0.71 and 0.72, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study provides a validated SCD risk prediction model with >70% prediction accuracy and incorporates risk factors that are unique to pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. An individualized risk prediction model has the potential to improve the application of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision making for implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT0403679.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations224
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207