Extracción y caracterización del mucílago de la malva común (malva sylvestris) y del guarumbo (cecropia peltata) para realizar ensayos en la formulación de espumante para la remoción de oro nativo en la minería artesanal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente trabajo es una investigación sobre la utilización del mucílago de Malva Común (Malva Sylvestris) y del Guarumbo (Cecropia Peltata), para la formulación de espumante en la que se terminó la remoción de oro libre por el método de flotación. Para ello se tuvo que inducir a la hidrofobicidad del oro con surfactantes como el detergente común y con la ayuda de la viscosidad dada por el mucílago, se logró la generación de una espuma estable, con una altura suficiente en donde se concentró el mineral, recuperándose en un 72%, frente al 81% que se obtiene con ensayos convencionales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it