Downwards force–displacement response of buried pipelines during dip–slip faulting in sandy soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the numerical analysis of underground pipelines against dip-slip faulting, it is common practice to model the problem as a beam surrounded by soil-equivalent nonlinear springs. Previous studies have recognised the importance of the vertical bearing soil springs (VBSS) in the modelling of pipe–fault interaction. Nevertheless, prior studies on VBSS are limited. This study presents an analytical framework for determining a hyperbolic force–displacement (P–y) curve for VBSS in dry sand. This hyperbolic criterion was established based on the ultimate bearing resistance (UBR) of pipe and the elastic subgrade modulus of the soil. Different mechanisms such as flow, arching, bearing, and friction, and various parameters like soil compressibility, pipe–soil relative stiffness, and soil elastic properties have been used in the determination of these two parameters. The P–y curves were verified and calibrated with experimental data. More reliable curves have been obtained compared to the existing methods. A numerical study was also performed to compare the current study with a pipeline seismic design guideline. The results of the current study method are in good agreement with sample experimental data compared to the seismic guideline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".