Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’accélération exponentielle de l’innovation technologique, la croissance et l’évolution des marchés, ainsi que les mutations dans les comportements de consommation, induisent des changements importants dans les modèles d’opération et les systèmes de gestion des entreprises. La transition énergétique est une des conséquences de ces transformations. C’est dans ce contexte que le Centre de recherche d’Hydro-Québec (CRHQ) a missionné son équipe Gestion de l’information : il s’agissait de mettre en place un dispositif de veille active, capable d’assurer une surveillance constante de l’environnement informationnel, en détectant les signes indicateurs de changements importants. Cet article retrace le cheminement de l’équipe pour concevoir et implanter un modèle optimal de veille, agrégé à partir de plusieurs modèles existants, puis adapté et personnalisé, afin de répondre adéquatement aux besoins informationnels et stratégiques spécifiques du CRHQ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".