MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024314289 · doi:10.1161/hcq.13.suppl_1.344

Abstract 344: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2020· article· en· W3024314289 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maneesh Sud, Lu Han, Maria Koh, Husam Abdel‐Qadir, Peter C. Austin, Michael E. Farkouh, Patrick R. Lawler, Jacob A. Udell, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Dennis T. Ko

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaceConventional PCIMedicinePercutaneous coronary interventionInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologyIncidence (geometry)PopulationCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Few studies have examined LDL-C control and outcomes exclusively after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Furthermore, guidelines provide no formal recommendation on when to check LDL-C after PCI. It is therefore conceivable that LDL-C is not routinely measured after PCI, many patients may have elevated LDL-C levels (≥ 70mg/dL), and that elevated LDL-C levels after PCI are associated with adverse long-term outcomes. Objective: To evaluate LDL-C levels after PCI procedures, and to assess the association between LDL-C and cardiovascular events in a population-based cohort. Methods: All patients who received their first PCI between Oct 2011 and Sep 2014 in Ontario, Canada, and had a cholesterol measurement within 6 months after PCI were included. Multivariable Fine and Gray sub-distribution hazards models were used to assess the association between LDL-C measured after PCI and the incidence of MACE (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and cardiovascular death) through December 31, 2016. Results: There were 47,884 patients who had their first PCI during the study period, and 52% had an LDL-C measurement within 6 months post-procedure (median age 63 years, 27% female). Among them, 57% had LDL-C < 70mg/dL, 28% had LDL-C 70 to < 100mg/dL, and 15% had LDL-C ≥ 100mg/dL. After a median of 3.2 years of follow-up, 19% of patients had a qualifying MACE. After adjustment, the incidence of MACE was significantly higher in patients with higher LDL-C levels (Figure). Conclusions: Only one in two patients had LDL-C measured within 6 months after undergoing PCI and only about half had LDL-C < 70mg/dL. Higher levels of LDL-C after PCI were associated with a significantly higher incidence of MACE. Recommendations for routine LDL-C assessment and optimization may improve patient outcomes after PCI procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207