MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024351089 · doi:10.1097/nrl.0b013e3181c923d5

Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis

2010· review· en· W3024351089 on OpenAlexaff
Sunita Venkateswaran, Brenda Banwell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Neurologist · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple sclerosisEpidemiologyIntensive care medicinePediatricsMagnetic resonance imagingDiseaseDifferential diagnosisMultidisciplinary approachEtiologyIntervention (counseling)PathologyPsychiatryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS), once considered a rare childhood illness, has been increasingly identified as an important childhood acquired neurologic disease requiring early recognition and intervention. SUMMARY: We present a comprehensive review of the current terminology of acquired central nervous system demyelination in children, pertinent investigations, including magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid cerebrospinal fluid studies, and an approach to the differential diagnosis of pediatric onset MS. In addition, the recent studies exploring the epidemiology and pathobiology will be discussed. Finally, we present an algorithm for the treatment of episodes of demyelination along with chronic immunomodulatory therapeutic options in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Although some similarities exist to adult onset MS, MS onset during childhood and adolescence presents unique diagnostic challenges and requires specialized multidisciplinary care for optimal management. National and international collaborative studies are underway to aid in the understanding of the early and ongoing pathogenesis of MS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.254
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe NeurologistSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207